Editorial policy

Source of experience

Our articles are based on Appfyl's product scoping, Flutter development, launch and support experience across mobile and web products.

How topics are chosen

We prioritize questions founders and business owners ask before ordering an app: cost, MVP scope, technology choice, launch risk, monetization, maintenance and industry-specific product decisions. One page owns one main search intent so the blog does not create duplicate answers.

Editorial process

Every published article has required metadata, a clear target intent, visible author information, an answer-first structure, FAQ coverage and links to relevant Appfyl proof points. Business-facing articles are checked for practical scope and decision value; technical articles are checked for architecture, platform and launch assumptions.

Sources and citations

When an article discusses app stores, payments, subscriptions, privacy, SDKs, platform requirements or analytics, we prefer primary sources such as Apple Developer, Google Play, Android, Stripe, Flutter, Firebase, Supabase and official product documentation. Benchmark reports may be used as benchmarks, not universal truth.

Use of AI assistance

AI tools may help draft outlines, compare sources, summarize public documentation and prepare translations. Appfyl remains responsible for topic selection, source checks, editing, examples and publication decisions.

Corrections

If a guide contains an outdated platform rule, unclear cost assumption or incorrect statement, we update the article and refresh the modified date after the material correction is made.

Updates

We update guides when pricing assumptions, platform requirements, launch practices, monetization rules, SDK requirements or Appfyl case references change.

Ilya Tkach and Sergei Gorelov

Cases